Each
member brings different talents, motivations, work styles, and behavioral
characteristics into the team dynamics.
This is why teams usually perform better than individuals. The team’s performance can be improved to the
extent that each member understands how they can best work with the other
members. Conflict is an inevitable part of business and team dynamics. Resolving conflicts is much easier with the
assistance of the Team Development Report.
Table
of Contents
- Problem-solving ability and learning speed (Working
with Numbers, Words, Shapes)
- Passions for people, data or things (Working with People, Data or Things)
- Reactions to stress, pressure, and coping style (Stable,
Poised and Relaxed)
- Temperament and values (Independent,
Competitive, Assertive)
- Preference for working in a team (Extraverted,
Group-Oriented, Outgoing)
- Work Style
– (Flexible or Rigid, Traditional or Non-traditional, Creative or Plan Ahead)
- Focus on Work - WORKS
TO LIVE (1) VS. LIVES TO WORK (10)
- Approach to New
Ventures - CAUTIOUS
(1) VS. OPTIMISTIC (10)
- Leadership Style -
DEMOCRATIC (1) VS.
COMMANDING (10)
- Preference for
Change - LIKES
ROUTINE (1) VS. LIKES CHANGE (10)
- Approach to
Conflict - FORCEFUL
(1) VS. ACCOMMODATING (10)
- Compensation
Preference - FIXED
SALARY (1) VS. COMMISSION/BONUS (10)
- Approach to
Self-Promotion - RELUCTANT
(1) vs. ASSURED (10)
- Approach to
Risk-Taking - CAUTIOUS
(1) VS. OPTIMISTIC (10)
- Approach to
Listening – CONTROLLING (1) VS. SYMPATHETIC (10)
- Composite Team
Analysis – Prevue
Major/Minor Scales
- Composite Team
Analysis – Prevue Approach
to Work Scales
- Available Languages for Prevue Assessment
Problem-solving ability and learning speed
General
Ability — an
overall indication of how well people work and learn. Low scores (1, 2, 3) are good for jobs
requiring monotonous repetition and/or unskilled manual labor. Mid-range (4, 5,
6, 7) are usually better for jobs requiring more training such as clerical work,
administration, and/or skilled labor. High scores (8, 9, 10) are often
important for decision-makers, managers, and advanced technical positions.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Working
with Numbers — a
specific measure of numeracy and reasoning with numbers. It shows a person’s ability to use numbers
for abstract reasoning and problem-solving.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Working
with Words — a
specific measure of literacy and problem-solving with words. It is the ability to use written language for
reasoning and problem-solving. In many occupations—clerical, administrative,
technical and managerial—the ability to work with written language is a
fundamental requirement. People who score at the upper end of Working with
words are more likely to be good communicators, but excellent fluency and good
communication skills can occur irrespective of scores on this scale.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Working
with Shapes — a
specific measure of mental manipulation of dimensional shapes. It involves several facets of mental ability.
Most important is the ability to imagine how something will look when it is
moved in space or when its component parts are rearranged. Spatial
visualization skills are important for tasks such as interpreting blueprints
and diagrams, understanding graphs and charts, and arranging objects for
display or storage.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Passions for people, data or things
Working with people — a specific measure of enthusiasm
for social contact. It indicates the
preferred frequency, quality, and intensity of social contact for optimal job
satisfaction. This satisfaction influences performance, especially in the long
term.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Working with data — a specific measure of zeal for
dealing with information. It measures
interest in information and analytical processes as well as overall motivation
to work with facts and figures.
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Working with things — a specific measure of incentive
to use equipment and tools. It measures
willingness to manipulate tools and machines and to operate equipment,
computers, and other inanimate objects.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Reactions to stress, pressure, and coping style
Emotional to Stable – a major scale describes reactions to
changing conditions and new people. It is based on the minor scales related to
restlessness and excitability.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Restless to Poised – a minor scale indicating how people respond to
stress such as adverse events and the negative things that other people say,
think or do. Some people can be unduly sensitive to this stress while others
may seem impervious.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Excitable to Relaxed – a minor scale measuring response to
potentially stressful situations. Some people are visibly upset by unexpected
circumstances while others manage their emotions well.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Temperament and values
Diplomatic to Independent -
a major scale measuring willingness to compromise self-interest to be
diplomatic in establishing relationships with others. It is based on a person’s
competitive instincts and assertiveness.
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Cooperative to Competitive - a minor scale measuring a person’s
need to win. Some people are eager to be cooperative and refuse to engage in
any form of competition. Conversely, others are driven to compete for
high achievement but to the detriment of all other considerations.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Submissive to Assertive - a minor scale measuring willingness
to dominate people and events.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Preferences for working in a team
Introvert to Extrovert - a major scale describing how a
person interacts with others and measures the degree of social contact
required. It is based on the minor scales for group-oriented and outgoing
behavior.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Self-sufficient to Group-oriented -
a minor
scale measuring whether a person prefers to generate ideas and stimulation in
solitude or with a group.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Reserved to Outgoing - a minor scale measuring whether a
person’s nature is to be somewhat detached from others or overtly friendly.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Work Style
Spontaneous to Conscientious - a
major scale describes the actions of those who seldom plan anything and whose
responses are almost always spontaneous versus those who tend to display
consistent, planned and predictable behavior. It is based on the minor scales
relating to conventional and organized behavior.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Innovative to Conventional - a minor scale measuring the
likelihood of creative thinking and reliable behavior.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Reactive to Organized - a minor scale measuring preference
for planning, detail, schedules and order. Some people would rather innovate
and improvise while engaging in big picture thinking but, for others,
meticulous planning is essential for job satisfaction.
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Focus on Work - WORKS
TO LIVE (1) VS. LIVES TO WORK (10)
This scale provides
information on the importance of work to the participant. Some people see work as a means to an end
while others define themselves by their work. People who live to work (10) can
be described as Type A personalities.
They are outgoing, ambitious, rigidly organized, highly
status-conscious, impatient, anxious, proactive, and concerned with time
management. People with Type A personalities are often high-achieving
workaholics.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Approach to New Ventures - CAUTIOUS (1) VS. OPTIMISTIC (10)
This scale
distinguishes those who approach new ventures or issues with caution from those
who approach new ventures with optimism.
Managers who are optimists have the ability to envision a better future
and they are able to inspire and motivate people to work toward achieving that
shared vision of success. An optimistic manager does not allow their people to
wallow in the dark and difficult times. Optimism is an emotional competence
that can help boost productivity, enhance employee morale, overcome conflict
and have a positive impact on the bottom line.
Highly effective managers have a transforming effect on their
constituents: they have the gift of being able to convince others that they
have the ability to achieve levels of performance beyond those they thought
possible. They are able to paint an optimistic and attainable view of the
future for their followers: they move others from being stuck with how
things are done around here and help them see how things could be done
better.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Leadership Style -
DEMOCRATIC (1) VS.
COMMANDING (10)
This scale provides
information on Leadership Style. It measures
a range from Democratic Style of leadership (1) to a more Commanding Leadership
Style (10). The democratic management
style is rooted in collaboration. A commanding management style is centered on
results and efficiency, and usually devoid of any collaboration. Researchers have found that the democratic
leadership style is one of the most effective types and leads to higher
productivity, better contributions from group members, and increased group
morale. Employees are encouraged to
share ideas and opinions, even though the leader retains the final say over
decisions. Employees feel more engaged
in the process. Creativity is encouraged
and rewarded. Researchers suggest that
good democratic leaders possess specific traits that include honesty,
intelligence, courage, creativity, competence, and fairness. Strong democratic
leaders inspire trust and respect among followers. Leaders with a Commanding Style are very focused
on results, specifically the bottom line, and are willing to do anything to
reach their goals. This means that they sometimes roll over people in the
process. Commanding leaders tend to be
more competitive, driven, and assertive.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Preference
for Change - LIKES
ROUTINE (1) VS. LIKES CHANGE (10)
This
scale identifies the extent to which someone prefers a structured work environment with a fixed routine versus a
dynamic fast changing work environment. Liking
and embracing change allows you to be more agile or adaptable. Change can open up many new opportunities,
new experiences, new skills, new ideas, new knowledge and information. Improvement is impossible without change.
Change allows for progress to happen.
When you like, embrace and seek change, it allows you to be proactive instead
of reactive.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Approach to
Conflict - FORCEFUL
(1) VS. ACCOMMODATING (10)
This scale
distinguishes those who are forceful in their approach to conflict from those
who avoid conflict by being accommodating.
Forceful managers (1) seek to assert their will over other people's
concerns. Accommodating managers (10)
seek to avoid conflict at all costs. The
accommodating style is one of selflessness and low assertiveness. Accommodating
managers are willing to give up just about everything in order to preserve
their relationships. Conflict is an
inevitable part of business and resolving conflicts requires many different
approaches.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Compensation
Preference - FIXED
SALARY (1) VS. COMMISSION/BONUS (10)
This scale identifies
whether a person is more motivated to
work by a secure salary or by performance-based remuneration. Regardless of your incentive strategy, all
compensation plans run on the belief that money drives behavior. A bonus plan requires meeting the expected
performance on both corporate and individual goals.
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Approach to
Self-Promotion - RELUCTANT
(1) vs. ASSURED (10)
This scale identifies
whether a person is reluctant (1) to put themselves forward while those who
score (10) are extremely self-assured. Self-confidence, especially in leadership,
makes you determined to realize your visions and goals despite challenges and
setbacks. Self-confidence tells you that you can achieve whatever you plan. You
are sure you can take your team with you to success. You make better decisions
because you stop second-guessing yourself.
You build trust because people around you think you have everything
under control. You are more likely to
speak up when other people around you are reluctant to do it.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Approach to
Risk-Taking - CAUTIOUS
(1) VS. OPTIMISTIC (10)
This scale
distinguishes those who approach risk-taking with caution from those who
approach risk-taking with optimism. Managers
who are optimists have the ability to envision a better future and they are
able to inspire and motivate people to work toward achieving that shared vision
of success. An optimistic manager does not allow their people to wallow in the
dark and difficult times. Optimism is an emotional competence that can help
boost productivity, enhance employee morale, overcome conflict and have a
positive impact on the bottom line.
Highly effective managers have a transforming effect on their
constituents: they have the gift of being able to convince others that they
have the ability to achieve levels of performance beyond those they thought
possible. They are able to paint an optimistic and attainable view of the
future for their followers: they move others from being stuck with how
things are done around here and help them see how things could be done
better.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments:
Approach to
Listening – CONTROLLING (1) VS. SYMPATHETIC (10)
This scale is
measured from 1 for a person who tends
to dominate a conversation to 10 for a person who is an exceptionally
sympathetic listener. Listening skills
enable a manager to understand the intentions and feelings of their team. Employees will be more open, positive and
motivated if they feel they are being heard.
Without empathetic listening managers are easily misunderstood. Effective listening promotes trustworthy
organizational relationships and customer relationships.
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Team Members:
D = Dan (Team Leader); G = George, S = Sarah,
L = Laura, F
= Frank
Comments: